Passive WTA players failed Peer
Posted: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:06 PM
The statement by the Dubai Tennis Championships to explain why there was a last-minute visa denial for Israeli player Shahar Peer cited security fears because of potential fan anger at Israel’s recent incursions into the Gaza Strip.
The outrage was immediate, but it was too late. The impact was quickly felt, but there is no guarantee the problem is solved.
In all, it was a bad week for the Women’s Tennis Association. No doubt the WTA was shafted by overtly fraudulent behavior from the United Arab Emirates. The WTA is like all professional sports in that cash is king. And long ago, it sold out to Dubai and the like.
But no other professional sport has the WTA’s backstory. No other sport was founded on the fight for equality. No other sport holds the same moral high ground.
To be fair, the WTA was in a bad position. Its players had already arrived in Dubai, appearance fees were in place, and sponsor obligations needed to be met. The United Arab Emirates orchestrated perfect timing.
So we accept that the WTA couldn’t bolt en masse. But why did not one player balk? Why did no one leave in support of Peer? There is no fairness in singling out one player, but how could Venus Williams, so vociferous in the fight for equal prize money, play on in DubaI? For that matter, how could Venus and Serena Williams, self-proclaimed victims of racist behavior by Indian Wells fans, not act on this wrong?
As Jon Wertheim succinctly wrote, “the Tour…gave in to bigotry.” It’s embarrassing for the Tour. Difficult, after all, how anyone could easily walk away from millions in this climate, but embarrassing nonetheless.
Now the United Arab Emirates says Andy Ram, an Israeli, will be granted a visa for this week’s Association of Tennis Professionals event. The WTA is positioning this as a statement that no Peer issues will reoccur.
Really? How so sure? The WTA lawyers must obtain the United Arab Emirates best legal assurance that Peer, and all players who qualify, are granted visas for any future event. And the WTA must adopt a two-strikes-and-you’re-out policy, admittedly a tough call in bad economic times.
But at some point, an entity, be it single or collective, has nothing but its character. The WTA Tour was built on that concept. It must subscribe to the simple but true theory -- do the right thing.
The Tennis Channel did the right thing (disclaimer: I work for the Tennis Channel at the Davis Cup and Grand Slams). Its CEO Ken Solomon wasted no time in bailing out on telecasts from Dubai. Solomon is a class act, and he made clear that he was in a much easier position than WTA head Larry Scott. Still, Solomon did the right thing.
In doing the right thing, the WTA can place the entire burden where it belongs – on the United Arab Emirates.
SECOND SERVES:
1. The Davis Cup didn’t need another blow, but Roger Federer inadvertently delivered one by bailing (due to a back injury) from the upcoming tie in Birmingham, Ala.
In hindsight, we shouldn’t be surprised, but I think we were romanced by Federer’s sheer joy at his Beijing Olympic experience. In the last three years, Rafael Nadal, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (legitimate injury), and Federer have pulled out of ties on U.S. soil.
2. Taylor Dent is using a protected ranking to enter ATP events in attempting a comeback. Back injuries sidelined him for several years. He said he avoided surgery at all costs, until it was the last option. Talking in San Jose last week, Dent is back with the revised attitude adopted by most that have seen the abyss and survived.
Interesting in that he is having each stroke in his matches charted by his lady, former pro Jennifer Hopkins, and his dad, former pro Phil Dent. Tennis is an individual sport thus there is no team or organization providing players with sophisticated analysis. Each player would have to make that leap, and that investment, on their own. Dent has done so, and is seeing the benefit of post-match analysis.
3. Donald Young’s progress has slowed. After playing the 2008 Australian Open on a direct entry, Young has slipped in the rankings to 134. Young needs freedom from his parents, and he must take advantage of the sound coaching at his disposal. He turns 20 in July, not old by any means, but no longer is he the next U.S. prodigy.