ABOUT AT BAT

MSNBC.com baseball analyst Ted Robinson gives his take on the hits and misses by players, managers, umpires and owners in Major League Baseball.

Robinson has an extensive background in covering the sport. He called the play-by-play on NBC's Major League Baseball Game of the Week telecasts from 1986-89. Additionally, he has been the lead play-by-play announcer for the Minnesota Twins, the television and radio play-by-play voice of the San Francisco Giants, and a member of the New York Mets broadcast team.



Thorny playoff issues for MLB

Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:57 PM

The stately New York Times, quite willing to critique postseason baseball telecasts, presented some puzzling offerings Wednesday. It was posited that Colorado’s eight-day layoff, unprecedented in length save for the 1989 earthquake-interrupted World Series, could harm its chances at winning the Fall Classic.

In 1991 Minnesota clinched the ALCS on a Sunday afternoon, and then waited until Atlanta clinched the NLCS on Thursday night. The World Series opened on Saturday night in Minnesota and, despite the nearly-six-day layoff, the Twins won the first two games, and went on to prevail in seven games.

Ratings for the NLCS were disappointing and raised the issue of start times. Should Major League Baseball have scheduled games earlier to appease East Coast viewers at the expense of West Coast viewers and fans?

The New York Times forgot about the 1995 postseason when the Baseball Network televised games simultaneously and drew the ire of fans and scribes who demanded the right to see every pitch of every game. In 1999, the Mets-Arizona series was televised by ESPN with the Arizona games starting at 11 p.m. ET, creating an uproar in New York. Yet an earlier start would have had the Mets and Yankees overlapping.

The lesson, which the growing legions of critics prove daily, is that television can’t win!

As the Red Sox play for survival tonight amidst an uproar over Manny Ramirez’ comments, here’s a thought: I doubt that Manny’s teammates are too bothered over what comes out of his mouth, especially those experienced in MannyWorld. They only care about what comes off his bat.

But the fans of Red Sox Nation are a different story. And so it goes in today’s sports world where the disconnect between player and city has never been greater. With the explosion of Latins in Major League Baseball, fewer players will live where they work. Whether it’s the American players who gravitate to Florida, Arizona, and Southern California or the Latins who head home for the winter, a great baseball town like Boston will rarely have a true hometown star.

So the equation is that the fans care much more about THEIR town than the players. Players want to win, but if they don’t, they go home to somewhere else where they are treated like heroes. Players don’t spend the winter living the same angst that grips fans in New England like nowhere else.

As aggravated as some Red Sox fans may be, I doubt this is an issue that anyone raises on a night when they play an elimination game. Tonight has to be about Josh Beckett. It has to be about Dustin Pedroia trying to bust out of his slump (5-for-29, .226 OBP in the postseason), about Boston manager Terry Francona wondering whether to play Jacoby Ellsbury for a spark instead of Coco Crisp (5-for-26, .222 OBP in the postseason), and about someone getting a big hit off the Indians’ bullpen. There may be a day of reckoning for Manny, but it isn’t now.

The Red Sox had the AL’s best bullpen but Cleveland is winning the ALCS. In Game 3, a two-run game, Rafael Betancourt retired Kevin Youkilis, Davd Ortiz and Many Ramirez in the eighth inning, then repeated the awesome effort in the eighth of Game 4 (albeit with a four-run lead). Cleveland closer Joe Borowski wrapped up Game 3 with a 1-2-3 ninth (retiring Mike Lowell, J.D. Drew, and Jason Varitek), and the Red Sox haven’t touched the Indians’ relievers in a key situation.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I don't know of one fan that was upset by Manny's comments here in the New England area.  Media has made far more of it than the local fans did.  We're used to it - as long as he keeps hitting - he can say what and he wants. . . and in this case he's right.  There's always next year!
"Should Major League Baseball have scheduled games earlier to appease East Coast viewers at the expense of West Coast viewers and fans?"  
It is not a matter of appeasing East Coast viewers.  Most of the games started at 10:00 p.m. East Coast time, a time when many people are already headed for bed. Most people don't turn on a game when they know it is going to end at 1:00 or 2:00 in the morning. Major League Baseball is shooting itself in the foot starting the games that late.  What a wonderful story the Colorado Rockies are.  Unforetunately, most people east of the Mississippi have no idea who they are.  MLB and Fox are setting themselves up for probably the worst TV ratings they have ever had.

As for the expense of West Coast viewers and fans, which fans?  If they started the games two hours earlier, the games would have started at 6:00 p.m. in Colorado.  What is wrong with that?  Are they afraid too many 10 to 12 year old children would watch the games.  In case they forgot, those are the future fans of baseball.  It makes no sense to eliminate the entire East Coast from watching the whole game because West Coast commuters would miss two or three innings.
Hello Ted Robinson
Here's a question. With a distinct possibility that a large snow storm could hit during the series at Coors Field what are the other options for a venue. Do they stay in Boston or move it to a neutral third venue in a warmer climate? Do they slug it out in the snow ? Just curious.
Thanks,
Tim Hahn
Guam
As far as TV goes, viewership was down because the most of the major metropolitan areas had been eliminated.  Colorado, Arizona, Cleveland and Boston are not huge population centers; even though Boston and Colorado draw fans from a large geographical region, they don't have the numbers to boost the TV ratings.
Here's another thorny issue ... as the playoffs get pushed farther and farther back and into November, it's just a matter of time before a major blizzard whips down into Denver or Detroit or Cleveland or Boston at just the wrong time and forces several games to be postponed. Even without snow, 20-degree nights aren't out of the question that time of year. When it happens, there will be calls to play the World Series in a warm-weather city, or at least in a domed stadium. Writers will write that Team A beat Team B because it withstood the cold better and not because it was a better baseball team. They will write that Pitcher A's career was shortened because he didn't get properly loose while pitching in the snow and hurt his arm. They'll call it the Ice Series. And finally, we'll have Bud sitting in his shirtsleeves in 20-degree weather exclaiming that he's not cold at all.

There's a simple solution to this, short of cutting back on the number of games: play doubleheaders on Sunday, like they did in the old days. Make them day-night affairs, of course, so teams don't lose the revenue. I know players hate day-night doubleheaders, but do they hate them worse than playing in the snow?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):